ClaimRoom counsel demo
Prepared by ChargeMark evidence bureau

Counsel Review Summary

A sample front matter page for a ClaimRoom evidence packet. It shows how ChargeMark classifies evidence, names what was not determined, and keeps the review boundary visible before any detailed inventory appears.

Audience
Defense counsel / carrier review
Matter type
Design-professional evidence inventory
Privacy
Local paths withheld by default
Storage
No PDF upload in this demo flow

What this report does and does not determine

Verified

File hashes, detected metadata, embedded signature presence, receipt match, timestamp status when available, and inventory counts derived from provided materials.

Attested

Signer identity, AI-use disclosure, review scope, responsible-charge statements, and authority basis when entered or supplied by a person.

Inferred

Visible seal signals, candidate control documents, probable working copies, timeline gaps, and pattern-based sheet groupings.

Not determined

Legal reliance, standard of care, admissibility, code compliance, insurance coverage, payment authorization, final issue status, and professional liability.

Evidence claim type taxonomy

Every ClaimRoom finding should carry a claim type. The taxonomy keeps cryptographic verification, human statements, system inference, counsel review, dispute status, and unknowns from collapsing into one green check.

Verified

Cryptographically or mechanically verified by the tool.

Attested

Stated by a person and bound to a record.

Externally verified

Confirmed by a public authority, registry, timestamp service, or other outside source.

Inferred

Derived from signals that suggest a conclusion but do not settle it.

Counsel reviewed

Reviewed by counsel preparing or using the packet.

Disputed

Formally contested by a reviewing party.

Unknown

Not available or not determined from the supplied material.

Outside scope

Useful to know, but outside this packet's engagement boundary.

Sample finding rows

CR-01
Verified
PDF metadata and file hashes were read from the provided archive.
Compare against counsel-selected control documents.
CR-02
Attested
Responsible-charge and review-scope statements depend on signer representations bound to the receipt.
Confirm authority basis and engagement scope.
CR-03
Inferred
Visible seal signals and filename patterns suggest candidate issued sheets.
Confirm with transmittals, permit portal records, or client correspondence.
CR-04
Unknown
The packet does not determine reliance, standard of care, code compliance, coverage, or liability.
Counsel decides whether additional review or expert work is needed.

Coverage map

Included

Provided PDFs, detected PDF metadata, visible-stamp signals, receipt references, candidate drawing sets, and file timeline signals.

Not reviewed

Native DWG contents, unprovided email transmittals, permit portal records, field installation, coverage documents, and privileged analysis not supplied to the tool.